Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Music Business Handbook and Career Guide

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Music Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinsel, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blades-Zeller, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychological Sex Type and Preferences for Musical Instruments in Fourth and Fifth Graders

Tiffany J. Sinsel

Heidelberg College

Wallace E. Dixon, Jr.

Heidelberg College

Elizabeth Blades-Zeller

Heidelberg College

Music education researchers have found biological sex to be in important determinant of whether elementary students persevere in musical instrument training. Psychological sex type may also play an important role. A sample of 108 students from two elementary schools completed the Children's Sex Role Inventory (Boldizar, 1991) and, following a presentation of nine typical band instruments, completed a survey assessing most- and least-preferred instruments. Results showed that masculine sex-typed students preferred, masculine-stereotyped instruments, feminine sex-typed students preferred feminine-stereotyped instruments, and androgynous students preferred neutral instruments. The converse pattern was obtained for least-preferred instruments, with the exception that androgynous children disliked both categories of sex-typed instruments. These results suggest that to enhance retention in musical instrument education, children's psychosocial identity ought to be considered.

Journal of Research in Music Education, Vol. 45, No. 3, 390-401 (1997)
DOI: 10.2307/3345534


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Update: Appliations of Research in Music EducationHome page
J. Eros
Instrument Selection and Gender Stereotypes: A Review of Recent Literature
Update: Appliations of Research in Music Education, November 1, 2008; 27(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Update: Appliations of Research in Music EducationHome page
J. G. Bayley
The Procedure by Which Teachers Prepare Students to Choose a Musical Instrument
Update: Appliations of Research in Music Education, January 1, 2004; 22(2): 23 - 34.
[PDF]